Post by account_disabled on Mar 11, 2024 9:20:01 GMT 5.5
May 26, 2020, Twitter flags as "potentially misleading" two tweets in which Donald Trump claims that mail-in ballots would result in fraud. The tweets remain visible, but with the addition of a "Get the facts" link which invites you to "check the facts" by consulting other information sources. Some time earlier the network had deleted the tweets of Jair Bolsonaro and Nicolàs Maduro, presidents of Brazil and Venezuela, for spreading false information about Covid-19. Trump tweets from May 26 reported by Twitter The president, within a couple of days, issues a somewhat botched executive order that limits legal protection to platforms for the content circulating on them (guaranteed by section 230 of the Communications Decency Act).
A mere act of anger and propaganda aimed at stimulating regulators to India Mobile Number Data change the law. May 29, 2020. The USA is in turmoil over the death of George Floyd, an African American killed by a policeman. Trump tweets about the Minneapolis riots “ when the looting starts, the shooting starts “. This time Twitter flags him as against policy for "inciting violence." In fact, the tweet remains visible if you go to the specific link , but if viewed in the timeline it is hidden and the motivation appears in its place. Furthermore, its circulation is limited (it is only possible to retweet it with a comment). Trump tweet from May 29 reported by Twitter The positions of Twitter and Facebook The affair sparked both political and inter-platform conflict.
Jack Dorsey , deus ex machina of this new interventionist approach, clarified that “the intention is to connect the dots of conflicting statements and display the information being debated, so that people can judge for themselves.” The ultimate goal, spelled out in a specific policy , is to avoid interference in elections and other civic processes. jack dorsey vs mark zuckerberg Facebook, which does not have a "civic integrity policy" but a policy on violent content, decided not to intervene, leaving Trump's posts visible. Zuckerberg has long thought that it is better not to activate fact checking in political discussions, in order to guarantee maximum freedom of expression, unless these discussions generate an "imminent risk of damage or specific dangers".
A mere act of anger and propaganda aimed at stimulating regulators to India Mobile Number Data change the law. May 29, 2020. The USA is in turmoil over the death of George Floyd, an African American killed by a policeman. Trump tweets about the Minneapolis riots “ when the looting starts, the shooting starts “. This time Twitter flags him as against policy for "inciting violence." In fact, the tweet remains visible if you go to the specific link , but if viewed in the timeline it is hidden and the motivation appears in its place. Furthermore, its circulation is limited (it is only possible to retweet it with a comment). Trump tweet from May 29 reported by Twitter The positions of Twitter and Facebook The affair sparked both political and inter-platform conflict.
Jack Dorsey , deus ex machina of this new interventionist approach, clarified that “the intention is to connect the dots of conflicting statements and display the information being debated, so that people can judge for themselves.” The ultimate goal, spelled out in a specific policy , is to avoid interference in elections and other civic processes. jack dorsey vs mark zuckerberg Facebook, which does not have a "civic integrity policy" but a policy on violent content, decided not to intervene, leaving Trump's posts visible. Zuckerberg has long thought that it is better not to activate fact checking in political discussions, in order to guarantee maximum freedom of expression, unless these discussions generate an "imminent risk of damage or specific dangers".